EV engineering recommendation

In EV scope there are scope adders and engineering. These tasks can be redundant with the task that CPM already entered as CSA auxiliary scope or extra work.

Engineering does not consider scope already defined in EV. (Only CPM need to consider everything)

If I accept these tasks scope adders and engineering task, I will have twice the same task in the scope. When wording is different and when there is 300 lines in the EV scope, I’m not sure that SM will identify the redundancy, these lines can be quoted twice.

If I reject them engineering could think that an obvious scope will not be performed, and it can create wrong information in the tool.

In the task status It would be possible to select a status “already included”